By Shehan Chamika Silva
- Kalinga Indatissa PC cross examines the witness
- Despite few missed calls no mobile conversations happened between witness and Aloysius after June 30
Senior Official of the EPF Department of the CBSL, Mr. Saman Kumara, who dealt on behalf of the EPF in secondary market transactions with Perpetual Treasuries Ltd, was interdicted by the CBSL, Additional Solicitor General confirmed today at PCoI.
The matter came to light when SC Justice Prasanna Jayawardena questioned ASG Dappulada Livera on media reports regarding the interdiction.
Questioning about the interdiction, Justice Jayawardena emphasized the significant of Mr. Kumara’s involvement saying that ‘he was the star role found through the PABC DGM’s evidence so far’.
Mr. Kumara was the dealer for the EPF in secondary market transactions with PTL, where Pan Asia Bank (PABC) had acted as an intermediary for both due to regulatory counter party restrictions.
According to the testimony of Deputy General Manager of Pan Asia Bank, R. A. Benedict Dias, earlier it was revealed that on the instructions of Former chairman of PABC, Mr. Nimal Perera the decision to act as an intermediary was made.
The evidence of Mr. Dias transpired that he had two meeting with Arjun Aloysius in the presence of former chairman in June, 2015 and March, 2016.
First meeting was in relation to the PABC’s role to act as an intermediary in secondary market transaction between EPF and PTL, while latter was in connection with whether to facilitate PTL with ‘intraday inject of cash” to settle payments regarding the bonds that they had obtained at the auctions took place on March 29 and March 31, 2016.
Earlier, it was also revealed in his evidence that Mr. Saman Kumara had obtain Rs. 25 million loan for his private purposes from the Pan Asia Bank when Mr. Nimal Perera was the Chairman.
Reliable sources said that CBSL officials are not permitted to obtain loans from other banks without a special permission.
Meanwhile, Kalinga Indatissa PC who appeared on behalf of Arjun Aloysius yesterday cross examined the witness regarding the allegations made against his client over interfering with the witness.
During the cross-examination, witness assured that after the meeting he had with Mr. Aloysius on June 30 prior to him being summoned to give evidence, Mr. Aloysius and himself had no mobile conversations even though Mr. Aloysius had made several ‘Whatsapp calls’, which were not answered deliberately by the witness.
When President’s Counsel asked the witness whether he had a fear of losing his job at the time he was meeting Mr. Aloysius, witness replied saying yes and there was a concern.
It was revealed when commission questioned that there was fallout between former chairman of PABC and the largest share holder of PABC, Mr. Dhammika Perera in March 2017, and subsequently, two officials of PABC got sacked.
Witness explaining to the commission said, those two officials had been sacked recently were following instructions of former chairman, Nimal Perera.
‘So, I was worried because I also acted according to the instructions of former chairman over the decision to act as an intermediary’, he said.
According to the witness, after a briefing given to Mr. Dhammika Perera by current CEO of PABC regarding the situation, Mr. Dhammika Perera had phoned the witness and had asked whether he had committed any illegal act.
“I said no, and assured that I never even had a cup of tea with those people who involved in the transactions. We got only nominal amount of profit in acting as an intermediary”
After that conversation, the witness said he received a call from Mr. Aloysius questioning whether the profit gained by PABC in the intermediary role was nominal or considerable.
“I doubted why Mr. Aloysius phoned me and questioned about profit soon after the conversation I had with Mr. Perera, therefore I was also in need of meeting Mr. Aloysius to clarify important things”, he said.
Mr. Arjun phoned me on June 30 and wanted to meet me, and he was pleading to meet me, I also wanted to meet him to get clarifications”, he said
Earlier witness said he was asked to support in PCoI proceedings by Mr. Aloysius when the witness met Aloysius at his house on June 30.
Further examinations of the witness will continue tomorrow.
No comments:
Post a Comment